This is a follow-up of
this blog post where the method referred to there is applied to TDoA maps.
The first example is a STANAG 4285 signal (FUO Toulon) centered on 8436.4 kHz (USB: 8432.6 kHz)
|
TDoA maps using ground-wave propagation delays |
|
TDoA using propagation delays based on IRI2016 |
The maps using propagation delays based on IRI2016 electron densities match better the (assumed) true position of the transmitter. It is a small effect but noticeable, and can be seen better in the side-by-side comparison below:
|
TDoA comparison |
Another example are the TDoA maps from
the last blog post where the TDoA maps based on more realistic propagation delays are more consistent between the two measurements; both indicate a position on the South coast of Cornwall:
|
TDoA comparison |
|
TDoA comparison |
1 comment:
Hi nice reading your postt
Post a Comment