This is a follow-up of
this blog post where the method referred to there is applied to TDoA maps.
The first example is a STANAG 4285 signal (FUO Toulon) centered on 8436.4 kHz (USB: 8432.6 kHz)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c0be/8c0beebc3b8482a6a4ab2fe5aeed904655313f52" alt="" |
TDoA maps using ground-wave propagation delays |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c8a/41c8a1d52d78dac2d6c5ce5b54c64965af75efc3" alt="" |
TDoA using propagation delays based on IRI2016 |
The maps using propagation delays based on IRI2016 electron densities match better the (assumed) true position of the transmitter. It is a small effect but noticeable, and can be seen better in the side-by-side comparison below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdc17/bdc172bf2bc588d9095d1bf0e761c82c2ab73eb0" alt="" |
TDoA comparison |
Another example are the TDoA maps from
the last blog post where the TDoA maps based on more realistic propagation delays are more consistent between the two measurements; both indicate a position on the South coast of Cornwall:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/990af/990af96b1eb522768358c07b41782c767f21234a" alt="" |
TDoA comparison |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85de5/85de5dd0101c4b78f1358ebb23e3c1635d8a1f6f" alt="" |
TDoA comparison |
1 comment:
Hi nice reading your postt
Post a Comment